Data Center | News, how-tos, features, reviews, and videos
Financial reasons for and against adopting Mac, Linux or Windows operating systems in the enterprise.
Apple commercials show the ultra-cool Mac mocking the pinstriped PC. Macs, it seems, don't care to be businesslike--they'd rather be up late mixing video. And there are other, more pragmatic reasons to keep them out of the enterprise--reaso
Even if the total cost of ownership were equal to that of a proprietary system, Linux might still carry a financial incentive--find out how.
Weu2019re at the beginning of the next generation of information and communication technology
Microsoft Windows not only works; it is simple to set up, maintain and keep users working--which fuels profits.
Mac OS is the hands-down operating system winner, from the perspective of cost effectiveness.
It's not that you shouldn't use Windows, it just that it's not always the most economical choice for your company. Here are seven surefire reasons to consider Linux, Unix or Mac alternatives.
When considering licensing costs, support, management tools, support and training, Windows and even Solaris make better financial sense than using Linux.
The consumer-friendly distribution of Linux is known for its quick, easy installation. Here's how it's done.
As part of his ongoing effort to find a secure, stable, user-friendly alternative to the Windows desktop operating system, CareGroup CIO John Halamka got to know Ubuntu.
Sponsored Links